Sum of a Recurrent Series
Summary: Euler (§231–§233) computes the sum of a recurrent series, finite or infinite. The infinite sum equals the generating rational function (when convergent). The partial sum up to is the rational function minus a “tail” rational function with shifted numerator. For a two-member scale, the partial sum collapses to a remarkably clean closed form involving only the last two terms of the partial sum.
Sources: chapter13
Last updated: 2026-05-07
Infinite sum (§231)
For a recurrent series
with scale — denominator — the sum equals the generating rational function
where the numerator is determined by matching power-series coefficients to :
(source: chapter13, §231–§232). The numerator degree is one less than the denominator.
This is consistent with §63’s derivation: the recurrence becomes homogeneous from the -th coefficient onward, where is the scale length, so the numerator stops at degree .
Partial sum (§232)
To find , write
The tail is itself a recurrent series with the same scale, so dividing by produces another recurrent series. Hence
(source: chapter13, §232). Subtracting from the infinite sum:
(Euler’s signs are consolidated in the final expression at §232.)
Two-member scale collapses cleanly (§233)
When the scale has only two members , the tail formula simplifies dramatically. Using the recurrence to eliminate :
(source: chapter13, §233). Only the last two terms of the partial sum (and the first two ) enter the formula — every middle term has cancelled out.
Worked Lucas example (§233)
For with :
At (substituting numerically into the partial sum identity, not the rational function which diverges there):
where is the next Lucas-like number. Using §227’s (sign by parity), the partial sum is
The partial sum is determined by the last term alone (source: chapter13, §233 Example).
Spot-check: gives . And . ✓
Notable points
- The cancellation is structural, not accidental. The recurrence means that from the third term onward, every coefficient is a -linear combination of the previous two. So the partial sum, telescoped against the rational function, collapses to a polynomial whose only surviving terms are at the boundaries.
- §231 needs convergence to be a numerical statement. As an identity of formal power series, the sum-equals-rational-function statement holds always. As a numerical equality — with given a specific value — it requires where runs over roots of the denominator. Euler does not flag this; it is implicit in his manipulation.
- The partial sum lets one evaluate at . Even when the infinite sum diverges (as in the Lucas example), the partial sum at is a finite expression, and the §233 formula still applies. This converts the partial-sum problem into evaluating a specific algebraic expression in the last term — a substantial simplification over summing the recurrence directly.
- The formula generalizes upward in scale length. §232 writes out the scale in full; the same telescoping mechanism gives a closed-form partial sum for any scale length, with the boundary terms involving the first and last series coefficients.
Why this matters
For finite sums of linear-recurrence sequences, §233 gives a single arithmetic step from any one term to the partial sum up to that term. For Fibonacci, Lucas, Pell, and more general two-member-scale sequences, this is a one-line formula — historically the first such systematic treatment.
For generating function purposes the §231 identity is the foundation: it says the rational function is the sum, not just a formal device. This is the basis for residue-style asymptotic analysis of recurrence solutions, in which one extracts coefficient asymptotics from the poles of the generating rational function.