Ch2.0.1 — Of the Resolution of Equations of the First Degree with more than one Unknown Quantity

Summary: Introduces indeterminate analysis — the branch of algebra for finding integer solutions when there are fewer equations than unknowns — and develops a complete method for solving linear Diophantine equations .

Sources: chapter-2.0.1

Last updated: 2026-05-08


Indeterminate Questions

When a problem furnishes fewer equations than unknowns, some quantities must remain free parameters; such problems are called indeterminate. The restriction that solutions must be integer and positive (or at least rational) sharply limits the number of valid answers — sometimes finitely many, sometimes infinitely many, sometimes none. (source: chapter-2.0.1, §1–2)

Basic Method: Iterative Reduction

Given one equation in two unknowns, isolate one variable and repeatedly extract the integer part of each resulting fraction. Each step introduces a new auxiliary variable. The process terminates when a variable appears without a fractional remainder, at which point it can be chosen freely and all earlier variables determined by back-substitution. (source: chapter-2.0.1, §4–9)

Example (§4): Divide 25 into two parts, one divisible by 2 and the other by 3.

Set . Then . For integrality, set , giving and . Since we need , yielding four solutions: .

Remainder Problems (Congruence Problems)

When each part must leave a given remainder upon division, represent the parts as . This converts the problem to the same iterative technique. (source: chapter-2.0.1, §6–9)

Example (§6): Divide 100 into two parts such that the first leaves remainder 2 when divided by 5, and the second leaves remainder 4 when divided by 7. Write and ; then and proceed by reduction.

Euclidean-Algorithm Table (Articles 17–19)

Euler observes that the successive quotients produced by the iterative reduction are exactly the quotients of the Euclidean algorithm applied to the two coefficients and of . This means the algebraic reduction can be bypassed entirely: run the algorithm on and , copy the quotients into a parallel column of recurrences for the unknowns, and the solution structure falls out immediately. (source: chapter-2.0.1, §17–19)

Two-column table structure

The table has a left column (Euclidean steps on and ) and a right column (recurrences for the chain of auxiliary unknowns). Each row carries the same quotient on both sides.

Example (Article 17) — solve . The Euclidean steps on 31 and 20, alongside the parallel unknown chain:

Euclidean stepUnknown recurrence

The quotients (1, 1, 1, 4, 2) are identical on both sides. The constant is attached to the last equation with a sign because there are 5 rows (odd); an even number of rows would give .

Back-substitution

The last equation contains no fraction (), so may be chosen as any integer. Substituting back up the chain expresses every variable as a linear function of :

Different integer values of produce the full family of solutions (the set forms an arithmetical progression).

General form (Article 19)

For , write the Euclidean decomposition The right column mirrors it exactly:

In the final equation, attach if the total number of rows is odd, if even.

Simultaneous Congruences (Multi-Step Problems)

To find satisfying several congruence conditions simultaneously (e.g. and and ), solve the first two, obtain as a linear function of a free parameter, then impose the third condition to produce a new Diophantine equation, and repeat. The final solutions form an arithmetical progression whose common difference is the product of the moduli. (source: chapter-2.0.1, §20–21)

Example (§21): Find with , , . From the first two, ; imposing the third gives , least positive value .

Impossibility Condition

The equation is solvable in integers if and only if divides . If , the iterative reduction produces a non-integer remainder, demonstrating impossibility. When , one first divides through by the common divisor to reduce to the coprime case. (source: chapter-2.0.1, §22–23)

Example (§22–23): is impossible because does not divide 2. The reduction terminates with the irresolvable expression .