Imaginary Numbers

Summary: Imaginary numbers arise in Euler’s account as even roots of negative quantities, especially square roots of negative numbers, and serve as algebraic markers of impossible real solutions. (source: chapter-1.1.13, source: chapter-1.1.18, source: chapter-1.1.21)

Sources: chapter-1.1.13, chapter-1.1.18, chapter-1.1.21, chapter-1.4.10, chapter-2.0.11, chapter-2.0.12

Last updated: 2026-05-09


Origin

No real number squares to a negative quantity, so expressions like , , and are called imaginary or impossible quantities. (source: chapter-1.1.13)

More generally, Euler says that even roots of negative numbers are imaginary, while odd roots of negative numbers remain real and negative. (source: chapter-1.1.18)

Reduction to

Euler reduces any square root of a negative quantity to a real factor times : (source: chapter-1.1.13)

Arithmetic Role

Imaginary quantities can still be manipulated algebraically. Two imaginary factors may give a real product, but a real factor times an imaginary one remains imaginary. (source: chapter-1.1.13)

Euler also remarks that logarithms of negative numbers are impossible and therefore belong to the same class. (source: chapter-1.1.21)

Interpretive Use

When an algebraic problem leads to imaginary answers, Euler treats that as evidence that the requested real solution is impossible. (source: chapter-1.1.13)

Cubic roots and imaginary values

Euler notes that every cube root has three values: one real and two imaginary. For , the other two cube roots are (source: chapter-1.4.10, §713). More generally, an th root has values total. In ordinary calculation only the real value is used; the imaginary ones are noted for completeness.

This generalises the earlier observation that square roots have two values (one real, one with ) to the cubic case. See cubic-equations and ch1.4.10-pure-cubic-equations.

Imaginary Quantities Producing Integer Identities

In Part II, Chapters XI–XII, Euler exploits the factorization to derive identities about integers by manipulations in the imaginary realm. Two key applications:

  • brahmagupta-fibonacci-identity: , derived by multiplying complex factors and reading rational/irrational parts.
  • Integer powers of : setting produces explicit integer parametrizations (cubes, biquadrates, fifth powers).

Euler comments in ch2.0.12-quadratic-form-as-power §191 that this is “remarkable, as we are brought to solutions, which absolutely required numbers rational and integer, by means of irrational, and even imaginary quantities.”

He also notes a subtle caveat: the inference “if a product is a power, each factor is a power” requires no nontrivial common divisors among the factors. For genuine imaginaries this is automatic when ; but for (real factors , ) the inference can fail. This is an early instance of the failure of unique factorization that would later motivate ring theory.