Chapter XIV — Solution of some Questions that belong to this part of Algebra

Summary: Seventeen worked Diophantine showcase problems that tie together every artifice introduced in Part II so far: rationalizing surds, bootstrap from a seed, residue-class impossibility, Pell composition, and infinite descent. The chapter is essentially a problem set rather than new theory, but two general theorems emerge — that and can be both squares only when is a sum of two squares, and that and cannot both be squares.

Sources: chapter-2.0.14

Last updated: 2026-05-09


Orientation (§212)

Euler announces that the chapter contains no new artifices but illustrates those already explained “by adding here some of those questions with their solutions.” The seventeen questions span all of Part II’s techniques applied to formulas that must become squares.


Q1 — both squares (§213)

Set , so must also be a square; let it be . Then , giving , so

Substituting fractional yields the family . Sample table:


Q2 — both squares (§214)

Same method: gives ; then must be a square , yielding

With : gives ; gives (so , ); gives .


Q3 — both squares (§215)

Setting , , the second formula must be a square — but no obvious seed except (the trivial ). Bootstrap with : gives

With : . Need . Examples: gives ; gives (so , ).


Q4 — both squares (§216), and the §217 Remark

Different mode: the product must be a square; set to get . Then , and reducing the leftover to a square requires to be a square, with seed . Bootstrap with produces

Selected values: gives (, ); gives (so , and ).

Remark §217-218: when is the question solvable for general ?

Replace by an arbitrary . The question is impossible whenever is not a sum of two squares. Reason: if and , addition gives , so is a sum of two squares — and (Article 170) must be too. The list of that fail (cannot be expressed as ):

For these , no — fractional or integer — can make both squares.

For specifically: would need , i.e., , the right side a sum of two squares divisible by 3. By Article 170 a sum of coprime squares can have no divisor that is not itself a sum of two squares — and 3 is not. Hence impossible.


Q5 — Resolving a sum of two squares another way (§219)

Given , find with new . Set , ; the cancellation yields

Free parameters . Example with (so the target is 2) and : , giving .


Q6 — both squares when (§220-221)

Concrete case : set , , so , also a sum of two squares (). Quick solution gives . For an infinite family, parametrize via Q5 with : writing for the new parameters, etc., yielding . Example : .

General case , write for the unknown: parameters recover the trivial , , i.e., and . With a second formula

generates further pairs.


Q7 — and both squares (§222)

Set , so and must be a square. The seed (trivial ) yields nothing; bootstrap produces . Five different root-ansätze on this quartic each peel off a subset of terms:

Root ansatz
(same)(same)

The case gives and . Iterating from gives a further , .


Q8 — , , all squares (§223-224)

Setting , the three formulas reduce to making , , all squares. For most this is impossible, “and its possibility entirely depends on the nature of the numbers and .”

Five impossibility cases shown by reduction to known no-square theorems:

  • , : would need a square — impossible by ch2.0.13-impossibility-biquadrate-sums.
  • , : square — impossible (Article 209).
  • , : difference of two biquadrates — impossible.
  • , : — impossible.
  • , : forces to be a square.

Method to find solvable directly: start with arbitrary , set , , so a seed makes both formulas squares automatically. Example yields : and to be squares, with seed . Bootstrap then produces and for (after some manipulation).


Q9 — General and both squares (§225-228)

Setting , : subtract scaled versions, get , which must be a square. Setting and leads (after lengthy calculation) to

After substituting for simplification: and , with , .

Example 1 (§226): — i.e., and both squares

and . Tabulation:

Hence both squares at : . Likewise at : .

Example 3 (§228) — Theorem §229-230: AND never both squares

A negative result: Euler proves rigorously that the system has no solution. Sketch:

  1. WLOG.
  2. must be odd (else , not a square).
  3. Then divisible by 4 (so , giving ).
  4. not divisible by 3, so .
  5. divisible by 3.
  6. not divisible by 5; or , leading to divisible by 5.
  7. Hence , so with odd coprime.
  8. with coprime, opposite parity, .
  9. With : , four candidate pairs all yield — impossible since must equal sum of two squares ().
  10. Apply infinite descent: any small solution would be smaller, contradiction.

The proof’s structure: residue classes prune to , then a divisor/parity analysis rules out every residue class for .


Q10 — , , all squares (§231-232)

“Very elegant solution”: set , . Then , , and the third formula

must be a square. Multiplying by : square; with root , get

Free . With : , giving

For integer solutions, set and . Examples:

values
or
or
or

So integer triples include , , , and .


Q11 — Generalization with constant (§232)

Make , , all squares. Same trick: set , — works for any .


Q12 (numbered Q11) — Four numbers with all six pairwise products squares (§233-234)

Six formulas to make squares. Setting , , handles five; the sixth (since ). Setting its root yields

with free.

A more elegant general approach (§234): represent via three fractions whose pairwise differences have unit numerators, i.e., etc. Then , , automatically gives . A table of compatible fractions:

Combinations of three such fractions handle three numbers; a fourth fraction extends to four.


Q12 (numbered Q12 in the source, §235) — all squares

Six formulas. Suppose , , — these last three give , so a Pythagorean triple: , , . Then for the first three formulas, parametrize via biquadrate differences . A worked example with produces

verifying all six conditions: , , , , , .


Q14 — Three squares with all pairwise differences squares (§236-237)

Want , , all squares. Divide by and set , . The remaining condition becomes

After simplification, must be a square. Setting and reduces to making a square.

Result: smallest known solution

giving , , .


Q15 — Three squares with all pairwise sums squares (§238)

Dual problem to Q14. Want all squares. Setting and resolves the latter two; the first reduces to making a square. Several parametrizations give nested solutions; the smallest:

with , , .

A bootstrap remark: any solution furnishes a new solution , since e.g. .


Q16 — and both squares (§239)

Set , so ; symmetrically , so . Solving:

Examples: gives ; gives .


Q17 — a square AND a biquadrate (§240)

Begin with a square: , . To make this a biquadrate ( raised), set , , so . Substitution gives , .

The remaining condition square reduces to a quartic in :

Multiple root ansätze produce sample integer solutions. A worked answer:

(with , , — Euler emphasizes the size to show the difficulty).


Concept Pages