Ch2.0.4 — On the Method of Rendering Surd Quantities of the Form Rational
Summary: Develops four systematic rules for finding rational values of that make a perfect square; demonstrates infinite solution families and a bootstrap technique for exploiting a known solution; derives Pythagorean triples as a byproduct.
Sources: chapter-2.0.4
Last updated: 2026-05-05
The Problem (§38–39)
Given constants , find rational values of such that
for some rational . When this is trivial: set and solve . The interesting case is the full quadratic, where the solution depends critically on the nature of , , and .
Euler restricts to degree in ; higher-degree formulas “require different methods which will be explained in their proper places.” The goal is rational (not necessarily integer) values of .
Prototype: Making Rational (§40–45)
The simplest non-trivial case is . Three examples confirm that rational solutions exist: , , .
Method 1 (§42–43)
Set . Squaring: , so cancels and
Writing and clearing denominators:
For every integer pair this produces a valid . A table of small values:
| 2 | 1 | 3/4 |
| 3 | 1 | 4/3 |
| 3 | 2 | 5/12 |
| 4 | 1 | 15/8 |
| 4 | 3 | 7/24 |
| 5 | 1 | 12/5 |
| 5 | 2 | 21/20 |
| 5 | 3 | 8/15 |
| 5 | 4 | 9/40 |
Method 2 (§45)
Set . Squaring: ; dividing by and solving:
Both methods produce the same underlying identity.
Pythagorean Triple Byproduct (§44)
Setting , compute :
which gives the general Pythagorean triple formula:
As a corollary, one can find two squares whose sum is a square (, , ) and two squares whose difference is a square (, , ).
Four Rules for the General Formula (§46–54)
Rule 1: is a perfect square (§46–47)
Write the formula as . Set
The terms cancel; solving for :
Setting and , the formula is also a perfect square, giving infinitely many integer solutions.
Rule 2: is a perfect square (§48)
Write the formula as . Set
The terms cancel; solving for :
Special sub-case (§49)
When the formula is . Set , giving
Application — triangular numbers that are also squares. The -th triangular number is a perfect square iff is a perfect square. With , :
Selected values:
| 3 | 2 | 8 | 36 | 6 |
| 7 | 5 | 49 | 1225 | 35 |
| 17 | 12 | 288 | 41616 | 204 |
(source: chapter-2.0.4, §49)
Rule 3: is a perfect square (§50–52)
If then the formula factors over the rationals. Setting , the roots of are , so
More generally for a product , set
Then , so
Rule 4: form (§54)
When none of the first three rules applies, write where , , are all linear in . Set
so . Dividing by : , a linear equation in .
Worked Questions
Question 1 (§52): is a square
Factor: . Set root . Then:
With : , and . With , : , so , and .
Question 2 (§53): is a square
, so Rule 3 applies. Factors: . Set root :
With , : (in range), so .
Question 3 (§55): is a square
: (not a square); neither nor is a square. Rule 4: write . Set root :
With , : , and .
Question 4 (§56): is a square
Write . Set root :
With : , and .
Bootstrap: Using a Known Solution (§58–62)
When a particular value is known to make , substitute :
This new formula has (a perfect square), so Rule 2 applies. Setting root and solving for gives an infinite family of solutions in .
Example (§59): . At : formula . Set : formula . Rule 2 with root :
Example (§60): . At : formula . Set : formula . Root :
Example (§61): . Trial: gives , so works. Set : formula . Root :
Impossibility and Chapter V Preview (§62)
The formula cannot be made into a perfect square for any rational . Substituting gives , which never yields a perfect square. Since such unmanageable formulas are numerous, Euler promises Chapter V will provide “characters by which their impossibility may be perceived.”