Ordinate Powers From a Fixed Point

Summary: §§419–425: the chapter-16 power-sum machinery, redirected to chord-distances. is solved by a §419-style framework; has genuine solutions only for even (odd requires squaring, which doubles intersections). The closed-form solution via the §372 trick (in sum-of-ordinate-powers-curves) yields ; §425 extends to mixed-symmetric-function generalizations.

Sources: chapter17 §§419–425.

Last updated: 2026-05-11.


(§§419–420)

This is the case of the §412 family . Substituting , :

with of degree , of degree . A second general form, using , is

with one degree higher than .

§420 lists the simplest cases:

  • : — circle centered at .
  • , (so , lowest non-trivial): , i.e.

  • , from the second form: , solvable to

(§§421–425)

§421 sets up the general problem via Newton’s identity in terms of . For : , but and are both irrational (carry as ), so demanding has no two-intersection solution.

§422 with uses , set , etc. — clean, no irrationality, because the square root sits under sign-controllable squaring.

The pattern Euler extracts: has solutions iff is even.

The §423 shortcut: §372 redux

§423 points back to §372 of sum-of-ordinate-powers-curves: rather than expanding , just use to write . Then becomes

Combining with (so ):

For even : rational, satisfies the desired condition.

For odd : removing the irrationality requires squaring; the resulting curve has four intersections per line through , not two — strictly speaking no solution.

The §410 confirmation: gives , which matches the boxed equation of constant-chord-interval-conchoid up to substitution.

§424 — same answer from the sum-of-chords path

§424 derives the same closed form via : with and , we want . Substituting and the same simplification:

confirming §423’s formula. The two derivations are dual; either symmetric function or leads to the same parametrization.

§425 — mixed-symmetric-function generalization

The most general form §425 handles in one stroke is

Setting , :

which combined with (taking or ) yields infinitely many solutions for each choice. The take-home is that any symmetric polynomial in equated to a constant fits into the Vieta-plus- framework, so there’s no further difficulty.

Why “even- only”

The non-irrational structure: and are non-irrational of degrees . So stays non-irrational iff the power of (after expanding) is even. Power sums are polynomials in of total degree in — i.e. overall — so even gives a non-irrational identity, odd gives an irrational one.